pretty printing bugs a bit

1 files changed, 31 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS
index de83186..17f196e 100644
--- a/BUGS
+++ b/BUGS
@@ -1,34 +1,40 @@
+---
+
 18:17 < Biolunar> when i change my resolution in dwm (to a smaller one) and then back to the native, the top bar is not repainted. that's since 5.7.2, in 5.6 it worked fine
 18:19 < Biolunar> is it just happening to me or a (known) bug?
 18:24 < Biolunar> and in addition, mplayers fullscreen is limited to the small resolution after i changed it back to the native
 
 reproducible with xrandr -s but not with --output and --mode, strange
 
+---
 
 > enternotify is handled even when the entered window is already focused
 > (eg moving the mouse to the bar and back, scrolling on the border..)
-	>
-	> focusing might be expensive for some clients (eg dim/light up)
-	>
-	> a possible solution is to modify enternotify:
-	>
-	> +       c = wintoclient(ev->window);
-	>        if((m = wintomon(ev->window)) && m != selmon) {
-		>                unfocus(selmon->sel);
-		>                selmon = m;
-		>        }
-		> +       else if (c == selmon->sel || c == NULL)
-	> +               return;
-
+>
+> focusing might be expensive for some clients (eg dim/light up)
+>
+> a possible solution is to modify enternotify:
+>
+> +       c = wintoclient(ev->window);
+>        if((m = wintomon(ev->window)) && m != selmon) {
+>                unfocus(selmon->sel);
+>                selmon = m;
+>        }
+> +       else if (c == selmon->sel || c == NULL)
+> +               return;
 
+---
 
 > another corner case:
 
 a tiled client can be resized with mod+right click, but it only works
 on the main monitor
 
+---
+
 dmenu appears on the monitor where the pointer is and not on selmon
 
+---
 
 yet another corner case:
 open a terminal, focus another monitor, but without moving the mouse
@@ -36,7 +42,6 @@ pointer there
 if there is no client on the other monitor to get the focus, then the
 terminal will be unfocused but it will accept input
 
-
 ---
 
 Donald Allen reported this:
@@ -57,3 +62,15 @@ privmail from 2 other people within one week, really strange).
 The quick fix is commenting out the code in lines 817/818 in hg tip 
 dwm. I cannot confirm this has no side effects (I think it does) and I 
 will address this issue shortly with a real fix. 
+
+---
+
+SDL seems to not like non-reparenting WMs:
+
+> I would like to mention SDL problems, however SDL is not crucial to
+> me anymore; people that really care about it should speak up and
+> propose dwm / SDL patch or cooperation scheme in that matter. 
+
+Patching SDL, bugging them?
+
+---